TTK Links: Home Page | TTK Moodle | ÕIS
TTK/UAS Repository For Digital Teaching and Learning Resources

Veduri C36-7I eksplutatsiooni analüüs võrreldes veduriga 2TE116

Dõba, Maksim (2015) Veduri C36-7I eksplutatsiooni analüüs võrreldes veduriga 2TE116. [thesis] [en] Analysis and comparison of locomotives C36-7i and 2TE116.

[img] PDF - Published Version
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (1MB)
[img] HTML (esitlus) - Supplemental Material
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (1MB)
[img] PDF (lihtlitsents) - Supplemental Material
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (427kB)

Abstract

Pärast põhjalikku analüüsi võin järelduse teha, et ameerika vedur C36-7I mittu korda parem kui 2TE116. C36-7I vedur on keskonna sõbralikum kui 2TE116, mis kindlasti mõjub meie loodusele. Majanduslikus vaateväljas 2TE116 kaotab C36-7I vedurile. Kütusekulu ameerika veduril on väiksem ≈ 30% kui 2TE116 veduril. Varuosade kasutuse aeg C36-7I veduril on mittu korda pikem kui 2TE116, mis majanduslikus plaanis mõjub firmale paremini kui vahetada 2TE116 veduri varuosad. Remonti ja vedurite hooldust on mugavam teha C36-7I kui 2TE116, mis automaatselt vähendab aega ja raha vedurite hoolduse ja remondi jaoks. Mugavuse mõttes vedurite meeskonna jaoks rohkem sobib ameerika vedur C36-7i. Tema kabiin on suurem ja mugavam kui 2TE116 veduril. Ameerika veduri juhtimis pult ja suruõhkpidur on paigaldatud mugavamalt ja nendega teha tööd on kergem kui 2TE116 veduri pultiga. Suruõhkpidur L-26 on korraldatud lihtsamalt ja mugavamalt ja nendega töö ajal ei tekki probleemi nagu suruõhkpiduri 394 kraaniga. Küll aga on L-26 pidurikraani puuduseks pidurimagistraali ülelaadimise võimaluse puudumine, seetõttu on ka pidurite lahtilaskmise aeg lühem (eriti pikkadel rongidel) Turvalise plaanis 2TE116 vedur kaotab igas mõttes ameerika vedurile C36-7I. Ameerika veduril paikneb liiva punker ees, mis kokkupõrke korral pehmendab lööki ja sellega võib päästa veduri meeskonna elu. 2TE116 veduril sarnane t turvalisus puudub. Loodame, et ameerika vedur C36-7I ja 2TE116 vedur veel töötavad ja toovad Eesti raudteedele palju kasumit.

Abstract [en]

After a proper analysis it is possible declare that american locomotive C36-7i is better than 2TE116. Locomotive C36-7i is less harmful for the environment which is definitely impacts on our nature. From the economical perspective 2TE116 as well looses to C36-7i. American locomotive consumes approximately 30% less fuel than 2TE116. Also period of use of the spare details for C36-7i is almost twice as long as for 2TE116 which positively effects on company’s budget. Other positive point of C36-7i is the uncomplicated maintenance which automatically minimizes time and money spent on it. In a point of comfort for the crew of the locomotive american C36-7i suits better. Its cabin is bigger and more comfortable than 2TE116 one. American controller and faucet are installed more appropriate and working with them is easier than working with 2TE116. Faucet L-26 is designed easier and more accurate, while operating it doesn’t bring problems as faucet 394 does. Considering safety 2TE116 looses at every point to C36-7i. At the front of the american locomotive there is a sand box which in case of a crash softens the strike and can save drivers life. 2TE116 doesn’t have this kind of protection. Lets hope that american locomotive C36-7i and 2TE116 will perform and bring a lot of profit to Estonia’s railway.

Item Type: thesis
Advisor: Anto Looken
Subjects: Transport > Tansport of goods
Transport > Rail transport > Railway engineering > Rolling stock
Divisions: Institute of Logistics > Railway Engineering
Depositing User: Maksim Dõba
Date Deposited: 17 Jun 2015 08:04
Last Modified: 17 Jun 2015 08:04
URI: http://eprints.tktk.ee/id/eprint/995

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item